Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$160.80 vs CA$349.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$1.06 vs CA$1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 188 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.86/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$349
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |