Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$160.80 vs CA$397.18
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.16 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 72% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - 239 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
139
58%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$397.18
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$397.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |