Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2825 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 180 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-8150 - CA$118.43 vs CA$160.47
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - CA$0.66 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$160.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |