Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$129.75 vs CA$244.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12600K - CA$1.28 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 126 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$129.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$244.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |