Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - CA$160.47 vs CA$179.98
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 21% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - 142 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - CA$1.27 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$160.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.98
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7165 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |