Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 3312 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$86.34 vs CA$288.31
- Up to 66% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than FX-6100 - 759 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
670
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
759
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$288.31
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$288.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |