Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3843 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$86.34 vs CA$176.74
- Up to 45% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$0.52 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than FX-6100 - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$176.74
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$176.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |