Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3827 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$86.16 vs CA$250.98
- Up to 62% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$0.74 vs CA$1.96 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6100 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
116
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7542 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.96/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$250.98
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7542 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |