Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$86.34 vs CA$193.76
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.46 vs CA$0.93 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6100 - 208 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$193.76
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$193.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |