Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$809.00 vs CA$923.17
- Up to 15% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$5.02 vs CA$5.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 506 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
157
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.88/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$923.17
87%
Buy for CA$923.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |