Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2999 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Core i7-3820 - 179 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - CA$809.00 vs CA$860.72
- Up to 14% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-3820 - CA$4.52 vs CA$5.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 395 minutes ago
Buy for CA$860.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 389 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |