Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 27% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 133 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$809.00 vs CA$923.17
- Up to 31% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$6.08 vs CA$8.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.79/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$923.17
87%
Buy for CA$923.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |