Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5152 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Core i7-860
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$74.58 vs CA$696.59
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.65 vs CA$4.20 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 44% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-860 - 166 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
115
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$74.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$74.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.2/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |