Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4866 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Core i7-860
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$74.58 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 61% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.70 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 42% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-860 - 151 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 16 vs 8 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
106
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$74.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$74.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |