Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3082 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Core i7-6700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6700K - 132 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$229.00 vs CA$253.79
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6700K - CA$1.73 vs CA$2.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$253.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1770 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2044 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700K | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |