Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3082 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Core i7-6700K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$253.79 vs CA$470.92
- Up to 40% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700F - CA$2.08 vs CA$3.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6700K - 137 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 28 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
122
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$253.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$253.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1759 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.44/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$470.92
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$470.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2033 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700K | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |