Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 795 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$229.00 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 13% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12600KF - CA$0.34 vs CA$0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-14400F - 697 vs 680 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
680
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6898 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
697
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
87%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6898 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |