Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 215 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$120.00 vs CA$409.00
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.66 vs CA$1.90 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$409
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |