Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$86.80 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.43 vs CA$4.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 2600 - 230 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.78/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |