Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1377 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - CA$86.80 vs CA$109.00
- Up to 7% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-12100F - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 5 2600 - 807 vs 675 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
675
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$86.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$86.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
807
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$109
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |