Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3476 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Core i5-3450
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$200.44 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 23% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12600KF - CA$1.01 vs CA$1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Core i5-3450 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
199
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |