Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Core i5-3450
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$200.44 vs CA$639.98
- Up to 61% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$0.84 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 77 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-3450 - 299 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
240
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7070 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
299
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$639.98
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$639.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7070 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |