Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 746 vs 705 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$237.23 vs CA$923.17
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
746
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$237.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$237.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 453 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
705
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$923.17
25%
Buy for CA$923.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |