Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$237.23 vs CA$916.09
- Up to 72% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900F - CA$1.87 vs CA$6.69 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-11400F - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$237.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$237.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.69/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$916.09
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$916.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |