Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1698 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 191 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$250.98 vs CA$919.55
- Up to 76% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$1.31 vs CA$5.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.41/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$919.55
27%
Buy for CA$919.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |