The Core i3-330M is a much slower gaming CPU than the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Core i3-330M vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
164
98%
Min 1% FPS
110
98%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189.88
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.13 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-330M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $132.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
