Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$105.13 vs CA$319.00
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$0.89 vs CA$2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 31% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6300 - 155 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$105.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$105.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.06/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$319
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |