Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - CA$105.13 vs CA$239.47
- Up to 43% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 5600G - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.20 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6300 - 199 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$105.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$105.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$239.47
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$239.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |