Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$105.13 vs CA$209.00
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$0.75 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 54% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 215 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$105.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$105.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$209
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |