Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$103.99 vs CA$199.73
- Up to 47% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Celeron G6900 - 178 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
177
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7463 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$199.73
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$199.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7189 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |