Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$103.99 vs CA$268.04
- Up to 57% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-12600KF - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G6900 - 282 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
254
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$268.04
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$268.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |