Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 90 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$103.99 vs CA$250.98
- Up to 56% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$0.29 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 378 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
378
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$250.98
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |