Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$103.99 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 61% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.47 vs CA$1.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G6900 - 227 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |