Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - CA$69.44 vs CA$377.00
- Up to 76% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 5900X - CA$0.75 vs CA$3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - 121 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
92
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.12/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$377
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$377 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |