Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - CA$69.44 vs CA$469.00
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-14700KF - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3900 - 493 vs 376 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
376
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
493
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$469
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |