Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$69.44 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 61% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-12600KF - CA$0.56 vs CA$1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 54% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3900 - 190 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
123
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |