Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$69.44 vs CA$209.00
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$0.48 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 48% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 215 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
67%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$209
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |