Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1983 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4800MQ - 205 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 47 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |