Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1955 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-4702MQ - 237 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 37 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |