Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 413 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 105 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |