Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 56 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 783 vs 751 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
783
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12963 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |