Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 188 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$299.0 vs CA$890.53
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$1.59 vs CA$5.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
89.8936170212766%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.27/FPS
30.170777988614805%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
33%
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
60.76803321224702%
Multi-Core
7539
73.42943410928217%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |