Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 696 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$280.74 vs CA$442.1
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.69 vs CA$1.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 429 vs 404 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
404
94.17249417249417%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
429
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
66.99029126213591%
Price, CA$
CA$442.1
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$442.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
68.89671361502347%
Multi-Core
6976
96.59374134588757%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |