Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 696 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 3400G - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$173.55 vs CA$280.74
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74970 minutes ago
Buy for CA$173.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
96.08177172061329%
Multi-Core
3619
51.87786697247706%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |