Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$201.47 vs CA$384.83
- Up to 37% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.47 vs CA$2.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 166 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
137
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.32/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$384.83
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$384.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |