Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1162 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$201.47 vs CA$498.98
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$1.59 vs CA$3.42 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
127
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |