Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 167 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$182.45 vs CA$729.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$1.26 vs CA$4.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.37/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$729
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
145
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |