Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - 176 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - CA$182.45 vs CA$379.95
- Up to 41% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 5900X - CA$1.27 vs CA$2.16 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.16/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
144
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |