Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8350 - 214 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$182.45 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.97 vs CA$2.33 per FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$499
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
188
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |