Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 2954 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3820 - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
117
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Renoir | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |